The Wuhan Lab Leak Deception

Journalists and scientists routinely dismissed the lab leak hypothesis as a crackpot theory and even as “racist,” up until the summer of 2021 when science journalist Nicholas Wade published an influential article, and a viral rant by Jon Stewart pushed it into the mainstream.
Until that point, social media platforms had been removing or throttling posts that took it seriously.

Anthony Fauci, who didn’t respond to our interview request, said it wasn’t worth even considering the possibility that COVID could have
originated in a lab.

More recently, emails made public through the Freedom of Information Act have revealed that Fauci, National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins, and other prominent public officials took the possibility of a lab origin far more seriously than they were letting on.

“Top virologists, sort of giants in this field, were looking at the genome and freaking out, basically” says health reporter Emily Kopp, who works at the nonprofit U.S. Right to Know, an
organisation that has obtained
thousands of pages of official documents and correspondence, some of which reveal an orchestrated effort by scientists to downplay the lab leak theory.

It’s also extensively analysed emails obtained via a lawsuit by Buzzfeed’s Jason Leopold that reveal the huge disconnect between what health officials were telling the public and what they were saying in private.

“A really central part of this entire story that maybe is not talked about enough is the fact that so many mainstream
publications have completely overlooked really key pieces of evidence in this story,” says Kopp. “We see a lot of health editors and health reporters prioritizing aticy narrative about Anthony Fauci over providing the truth to their readers.

U.S. Right to Know is devoting significant resources to its ‘COVID-19 Origins’ research with the mission of “investigating the origins of Covid-19, the risks of gain-of-function research and mishaps at biolabs where pathogens of pandemic potentials are stored and manipulated.

Kopp has assembled a comprehensive timeline that lays out substantial evidence that Fauci, Collins, and a number of influential scientists misled the public. Whether or not the lab leak theory is correct, it’s now clear that these public officials concealed their conflicts of interest with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and minimised their own roles in providing government funding for unsupervised gain-of-function research that may have led to the pandemic.

“It seems to me like the status quo is more or less continuing unabated,” says Kupp. “I don’t think that experiments are
actually slowing, and I think they might actually be accelerating.

Covid booster causes inflammation in young men

More Post-Vaccination Heart Inflammation Among Young Males After COVID Booster: CDC
Young males suffered heart inflammation at higher rates following a booster dose of Pfizer’s #Vaccine against #COVID19, according to newly released #CDC data.

Two years after the First UK Lockdown, a Full Analysis including the Neil Ferguson Forecasting Model

A vital Report and forecasting model had been released a week earlier March 16, 2020 by the Neil Ferguson team at Imperial College London.

The UK went into Lockdown on March 23, 2020. According to many this moment in history kicked off a radical upheaval of almost all aspects of economics, law, and public health.

This video analyses that report and the balance and management of the UK government’s response.

How badly has two years of lockdown and fear affected all of us?

Two years of lockdown and fear has affected us all, but just how affected? A deep psychological analysis sheds light on the deep impacts on mental health. Could these effects be caused by covid itself? Or are they the effects of the government’s response?

Pfizer expects $102 billion in 2022 – a new record

How an extremely rich set of organisations, richer than many countries, are manipulating global organisations such as the World Economic Foundation (WEF) and the United Nations (UN), in order to implement Globalist strategies.

How the Globalists’ strategies are effectively, and currently, transferring wealth from the treasuries of nations into the revenue streams of private corporations.

Lockdowns did zero help

Something that MSM is unsurprisingly not talking about… a new meta-analysis of the efficacy of the Covid-1984 protocols (lockdowns, 6ft rule, et al) has shown that while Sage was saying that “lockdowns would prevent 98% of covid deaths”, the actual figure was “little to no effect”… and that this was already known following the last pandemic. So it was all a deliberate lie.

So again… why is the MSM not talking about this report?

Complete Two Dose Vaccine Failure in Scotland

Scotland is max-vaxxed, with more enforcement than England. It has been the source of a number of good stories wherein some isolated group of people, almost all vaccinated, suffered a huge breakout of COVID, and the unvaxxed were the least affected. And press stories wondering about huge rises in “mysterious” heart attacks from blocked arteries. Scotland also publishes detailed excess death numbers, and we saw excess deaths rise steeply in each age band as it became eligible and began vaccinating.

Scotland has also led the UK in revealing negative vaccine efficacy. In terms of case numbers, that’s visible in many countries and exploding with Omicron. But in Scotland it has also been visible already in hospitalisations and deaths. This substack article looks at the most recent data, population-adjusted and age-adjusted week to week. You’ll see that hospitalisations and death rates are lowest for the unvaccinated and highest for the double-vaccinated. The limited protection of the second dose wearing off is why they’re chasing people to get boosted. But the unvaccinated are also doing better than the triple-jabbed.

See some key data points in the comments.